Part 1980—procedures for the Handling of Discrimination Complaints under Section 806 of the Corporate and Criminal Fraud Account- Ability Act of 2002, Title Viii of the Sarbanes-oxley Act
ثبت نشده
چکیده
(a) This part implements procedures under section 806 of the Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, Title VIII of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (‘‘Sarbanes-Oxley’’ or ‘‘Act’’), enacted into law July 30, 2002. Sarbanes-Oxley provides for employee protection from discrimination by companies and representatives of companies because the employee has engaged in protected activity pertaining to a violation or alleged violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341, 1343, 1344, or 1348, or any rule or regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any provision of Federal law relating to fraud against shareholders. (b) This part establishes procedures pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley for the expeditious handling of discrimination complaints made by employees, or by persons acting on their behalf. These rules, together with those rules codified at 29 CFR part 18, set forth the procedures for submission of complaints under Sarbanes-Oxley, investigations, issuance of findings and preliminary orders, objections to findings and orders, litigation before administrative law judges, post-hearing administrative review, and withdrawals and settlements.
منابع مشابه
The Effects of Audit Committee Activities and Deterring Fraud: an Empirical Investigation of the Predicted Effectiveness of the Sarbanes-oxley Act
The financial frauds of recent past have created a lot of attention to financial audits and corporate governance. That attention includes the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Act has led to numerous changes in corporate governance. But will the changes affect financial fraud? This research attempts to gather empirical evidence about audit committees, S-OX, and whether the guidelines of S-OX hav...
متن کاملShareholder Wealth Effects of MANAGEMENT Regulatory COMPLIANCE
Purpose: This paper addresses whether and how the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(SOX) affects shareholder wealth (firm value) by focusing on the trade-off between improved corporate governance leading to a lower cost of capital and increased managerial compliance costs of regulations. Design/Methodology: We use an analytical model of solving the management utility maximization function and the cha...
متن کاملThe Sarbanes-Oxley Act and Corporate Investment: A Structural Assessment∗
We assess the impact of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on corporate investment in an investment Euler equation framework, where a dummy for the passage of the Act is allowed to affect the rate at which managers discount future investment payoffs. Using generalized method of moments estimators, we find that the rate U.S. firm managers apply to discount investment projects rises significantly aft...
متن کاملOpen Access Andersen v. U.S.: Policy Implications and a Social Science Research Agenda
The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the conviction of Arthur Andersen, LLP for its involvement in the Enron scandal. The Court held that that the jury instructions did not accurately convey the meaning of the witness tampering statute that Andersen was charged with. Since the original trial, relevant sections of the Criminal Code were updated with the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002). Alt...
متن کاملSarbanes-Oxley Links IT to Corporate Compliance
In the wake of financial frauds and related audit issues, the US Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley (SARBOX) Act of 2002. Key to becoming SARBOX compliant are information systems (IS) that satisfy the mandates regarding internal controls, corporate governance, and fraud detection. These legal developments focusing senior management's attention on (1) internal controls are present and functionin...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014